github Python analyzed b97fbfe

Agience/agience-core

github

The operating system that AI workflows trust. Structure messy inputs. Establish identity. Track provenance. Build the durable data layer your AI workflows need to be trusted, reusable, and auditable.

maintainer
Agience
license
NOASSERTION
first seen
2026-06-01
last seen
2026-09-03
releases · 30d
0
short id
risk 46/100 · heuristic grade
C elevated inferred analyzer v33 (current)
  • capability exposure inferred + 35
  • tool safety inferred + 14
  • trust mitigators mixed − 3

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

grade last moved 10h ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 3 movements
  • C · 58 C · 46
  • B · 32 C · 58
  • A · 0 B · 32
capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 4 findings · grade factor +14
  1. medium dangerous code

    dynamic exec: __import__()

  2. medium toxic flow (lethal trifecta)

    lethal trifecta reachable across this server's tools: private-data access + untrusted-content ingestion + network exfil

  3. low exfiltration combo rotate_api_key

    single tool reads + sends: net, secrets

  4. low exfiltration combo

    sensitive read and network capabilities split across this server's tools

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit b97fbfe · analyzer v33 · 3d ago

danger signals1

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:Agience/agience-core/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:Agience/agience-core/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of Agience.