MCP Observatory
github analyzed dd61744

COSAI-Labs/make-money-30day-challenge

github

45+ dev tools via MCP: JSON, QR, hash, DNS, code review, fake data, screenshots, and more.

maintainer
COSAI-Labs
license
—
first seen
2026-06-03
last seen
2026-06-03
releases · 30d
0
short id
risk 47/100 · heuristic grade
C elevated
  • capability exposureinferred+35
  • recent driftinferred+20
  • trust mitigatorsmixed−8

inferredmixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 15m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 1 movements
  • C · 59 → C · 47
capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety all quiet

No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit dd61744 · analyzer v18 · 9h ago

skills & prompt files 1

other grade factors evidence elsewhere
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:COSAI-Labs/make-money-30day-challenge/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:COSAI-Labs/make-money-30day-challenge/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of COSAI-Labs.