github Python re-analysis due unconfirmed MCP

CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development

github

Practices, protocols, and skills for AI-driven software development. Skills and safety hooks for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Antigravity, and any agent supporting the Agent Skills standard.

maintainer
CodeAlive-AI
license
MIT
first seen
2026-06-07
last seen
2026-08-26
releases · 30d
18
short id
risk 20/100 · heuristic grade
B low inferred analyzer v32 (1 behind)

This grade was produced by analyzer v32 , 1 version behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.

  • capability exposure inferred + 16
  • tool safety inferred + 12
  • trust mitigators mixed − 8

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 9m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 4 movements
  • A · 8 B · 20
  • A · 13 A · 8
  • B · 32 A · 13
  • A · 0 B · 32
capability exposure grade factor +16
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +12
  1. high dangerous code

    suspicious bundled script in 2 file(s)

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit c6cecbe · analyzer v32 · 1w ago

skills & prompt files 43

danger signals2

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of CodeAlive-AI.