Lightweight read-only multi-agent council for coding CLIs
- capability exposure inferred + 35
- recent drift inferred + 12
- tool safety inferred + 12
- trust mitigators mixed − 3
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
graded 4m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 32 → C · 56
No known CVEs for this server.
- high dangerous code
committed secret: Anthropic key, GitHub token · dynamic exec: __import__ sink
analyzed commit 8e0bc96 · analyzer v28 · 3h ago
skills & prompt files 1
- agent-rules Intellimetrics-llm-council-8e0bc96/CLAUDE.md
danger signals4
- dynamic code execution __import__ sink Intellimetrics-llm-council-8e0bc96/tests/test_llm_council.py :3756
assert __import__("os").environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"] == "from-env" - suspicious endpoint 169.254.169.254 (cloud metadata) Intellimetrics-llm-council-8e0bc96/tests/test_llm_council.py :6890
"http://169.254.169.254/v1", - committed secret Anthropic key Intellimetrics-llm-council-8e0bc96/tests/test_safety.py :40
sk-ant…(49 chars, redacted) - committed secret GitHub token Intellimetrics-llm-council-8e0bc96/tests/test_safety.py :82
ghp_aa…(40 chars, redacted)
- recent drift +12 capability drift →
Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of Intellimetrics.