MCP server for the Labs64 NetLicensing license management API
- capability exposure inferred + 24
- tool safety inferred + 7
- trust mitigators mixed − 9
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
grade last moved 10h ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- C · 55 → B · 22
- B · 24 → C · 55
- B · 15 → B · 24
- B · 27 → B · 15
- B · 33 → B · 27
- C · 49 → B · 33
No known CVEs for this server.
- medium toxic flow (lethal trifecta)
lethal trifecta reachable across connected servers: this server can exfiltrate (network) while a connected dependency supplies private-data access / untrusted-content ingestion
- low exfiltration combo netlicensing_create_api_token
single tool reads + sends: net, secrets
analyzed commit 81de270 · analyzer v33 · 2w ago
skills & prompt files 2
- agent-rules Labs64-NetLicensing-MCP-81de270/AGENTS.md
- agent-rules Labs64-NetLicensing-MCP-81de270/CLAUDE.md
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:Labs64/NetLicensing-MCP/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of Labs64.