github Python re-analysis due

PavloSEO/seotools

github

SEO evidence toolkit: analyzes Screaming Frog exports, adds bounded live and infrastructure checks, and produces structured audits, task backlogs, and reports via CLI and local MCP.

maintainer
PavloSEO
license
MIT
first seen
2026-09-04
last seen
2026-09-06
releases · 30d
0
short id
risk 32/100 · heuristic grade
B low inferred analyzer v33 (current)
  • capability exposure inferred + 22
  • tool safety inferred + 10

inferred

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

grade last moved 10h ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

capability exposure grade factor +22
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 2 findings · grade factor +10
  1. medium dangerous code

    dynamic exec: __import__()

  2. medium toxic flow (lethal trifecta)

    lethal trifecta reachable across this server's tool + source surface: private-data access + untrusted-content ingestion + network exfil (a leg is proven only in the analyzed source)

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 0cc5acd · analyzer v33 · 2d ago

skills & prompt files 29

danger signals4

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:PavloSEO/seotools/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:PavloSEO/seotools/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of PavloSEO.