MCP Observatory
github re-analysis due

agent-receipts/openclaw

github

Agent Receipts / Obsigna plugin for OpenClaw — cryptographically signed audit trail for agent actions

maintainer
agent-receipts
license
NOASSERTION
first seen
2026-06-09
last seen
2026-06-13
releases · 30d
4
short id
risk 25/100 · heuristic grade
B low
  • capability exposureinferred+28
  • trust mitigatorsmixed−3

inferredmixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 14m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 1 movements
  • A · 0 → B · 25
capability exposure grade factor +28
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety all quiet

No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 521f45b · analyzer v17 · 11h ago

skills & prompt files 2

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:agent-receipts/openclaw/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:agent-receipts/openclaw/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of agent-receipts.