github Go re-analysis due

bilkulsahi1235/agent-egress-bench

github

Provide an open test corpus to assess and improve AI agent egress security through validated cases and automated workflows.

maintainer
bilkulsahi1235
license
Apache-2.0
first seen
2026-06-05
last seen
2026-08-26
releases · 30d
0
short id
risk 32/100 · heuristic grade
B low inferred analyzer v30 (3 behind)

This grade was produced by analyzer v30 , 3 version s behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.

  • recent drift inferred + 20
  • tool safety inferred + 12

inferred

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 8m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 2 movements
  • B · 24 B · 32
  • A · 0 B · 24
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +12
  1. high dangerous code

    committed secret: private key

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 9b0874d · analyzer v30 · 2w ago

skills & prompt files 1

danger signals1

other grade factors evidence elsewhere
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:bilkulsahi1235/agent-egress-bench/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:bilkulsahi1235/agent-egress-bench/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of bilkulsahi1235.