Scaffold, test, and publish MCP servers in minutes
- capability exposure inferred + 10
- tool safety inferred + 5
inferred
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
grade last moved 5d ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 27 → B · 15
- C · 35 → B · 27
- B · 27 → C · 35
- A · 0 → B · 27
No known CVEs for this server.
- medium dangerous code
dynamic exec: eval()/exec()
analyzed commit c2cad3b · analyzer v33 · 2w ago
danger signals1
- dynamic code execution eval()/exec() cognis-digital-mcpforge-c2cad3b/mcpforge/core.py :341
exec(compiled, ns) # noqa: S102 - we generated this source ourselves
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:cognis-digital/mcpforge/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of cognis-digital.