github Python analyzed 3f7fb86

darshjoshi/pitwall

github

Turn Claude into your F1 race engineer — 79 MCP tools for telemetry, strategy, and 75 years of race history

maintainer
darshjoshi
license
MIT
first seen
2026-06-26
last seen
2026-08-02
releases · 30d
1
short id
risk 16/100 · heuristic grade
B low
  • capability exposure inferred + 14
  • tool safety inferred + 5
  • trust mitigators mixed − 3

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 5m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 3 movements
  • A · 11 B · 16
  • A · 14 A · 11
  • A · 0 A · 14
capability exposure grade factor +14
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +5
  1. medium toxic flow (lethal trifecta)

    lethal trifecta reachable across this server's tool + source surface: private-data access + untrusted-content ingestion + network exfil (a leg is proven only in the analyzed source)

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 3f7fb86 · analyzer v28 · 1d ago

skills & prompt files 2

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:darshjoshi/pitwall/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:darshjoshi/pitwall/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of darshjoshi.