not analyzable — repository too large to scan in full (large monorepo)
You, multiplied. Mission control for Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode: see every session, approve what your agents do, and run them on a schedule. Self-hosted, MIT.
Insufficient evidence to grade. This server's source has not been statically analyzed, so a low grade would only mean "nothing found", not "nothing there". We don't show a reassuring grade we can't stand behind. Attested signals (CVEs, provenance) below still apply.
Once the source is analyzed (see the analysis flag in the header), a graded score appears here. How analysis works: methodology.
- C · 44 → B · 32
- C · 52 → C · 44
- C · 57 → C · 52
- D · 69 → C · 57
- C · 49 → D · 69
- B · 32 → C · 49
- A · 0 → B · 32
No known CVEs for this server.
- medium toxic flow (lethal trifecta)
lethal trifecta reachable across this server's tool + source surface: private-data access + untrusted-content ingestion + network exfil (a leg is proven only in the analyzed source)
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:dork-labs/dorkos/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of dork-labs.