MCP Observatory
github re-analysis due

froggy523/froggy-aura

github

Project memory for Cursor and AI coding agents: intuition served through MCP.

maintainer
froggy523
license
NOASSERTION
first seen
2026-06-08
last seen
2026-06-14
releases · 30d
38
short id
risk 34/100 · heuristic grade
B low
  • capability exposureinferred+35
  • tool safetyinferred+2
  • trust mitigatorsmixed−3

inferredmixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 12m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 2 movements
  • C · 46 → B · 34
  • C · 49 → C · 46
capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +2
  1. lowexfiltration combo

    sensitive read and network capabilities split across this server's tools

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit ba97b91 · analyzer v17 · 3d ago

skills & prompt files 2

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:froggy523/froggy-aura/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:froggy523/froggy-aura/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of froggy523.