Chrome Bridge: MCP server for browser automation via Chrome extension (ChromeOS/Crostini)
- capability exposureinferred+28
- recent driftinferred+20
- tool safetyinferred+25
inferred
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
graded 8m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- D · 65 → D · 73
- D · 60 → D · 65
no known CVEs for this server.
- highdangerous code
dynamic exec: eval()
- highexfiltration combohttp_auth
single tool reads + sends: net, secrets
- highexfiltration comboupload_file
single tool reads + sends: fs, net
- hightool shadowingexecute_js
tool "execute_js" shadows a verified server's tool
analyzed commit 62f690d · analyzer v17 · 2d ago
danger signals1
- dynamic code executioneval()frsorrentino-chrome-bridge-62f690d/extension/service-worker.js:398
return eval(codeStr);
- recent drift+20 capability drift →
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:frsorrentino/chrome-bridge/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of frsorrentino.