Desktop app for project documentation with a built-in AI assistant.
This grade was produced by analyzer v23 , 10 version s behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.
- capability exposure inferred + 22
- trust mitigators mixed − 3
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
grade last moved 3d ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 31 → B · 19
- C · 39 → B · 31
- C · 51 → C · 39
- C · 43 → C · 51
- A · 0 → C · 43
No known CVEs for this server.
No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:gangelxxx/ccDoc/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of gangelxxx.