github Python analyzed 8d4fac9

jeffbai996/vecgrep

github

grep using meaning and similarity instead of keywords - local/self-hosted, multimodal, and runnable on any user-defined corpus

maintainer
jeffbai996
licence
MIT
first seen
2026-06-13
last seen
2026-09-10
releases · 30d
0
short id
risk 64/100 · heuristic grade
D high inferred analyzer v33 (current)
  • capability exposure inferred + 35
  • recent drift inferred + 20
  • tool safety inferred + 12
  • trust mitigators mixed − 3

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

grade last moved 3d ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 3 movements
  • D · 67 D · 64
  • C · 38 D · 67
  • A · 0 C · 38
capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +12
  1. high dangerous code

    dynamic exec: pickle.loads()

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 8d4fac9 · analyzer v33 · 1h ago

skills & prompt files 1

danger signals2

other grade factors evidence elsewhere
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:jeffbai996/vecgrep/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:jeffbai996/vecgrep/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of jeffbai996.