Pre-indexed code knowledge graph via treesitter, enchanced query with RAG, MCP server, private and local storage. Agent ready.
This grade was produced by analyzer v30 , 3 version s behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.
- capability exposure inferred + 4
- recent drift inferred + 20
- tool safety inferred + 12
- trust mitigators mixed − 8
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
graded 5m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 33 → B · 28
- B · 21 → B · 33
- A · 0 → B · 21
No known CVEs for this server.
- high dangerous code
committed secret: GitHub fine-grained PAT
analyzed commit 2eeb61a · analyzer v30 · 2w ago
skills & prompt files 3
danger signals1
- committed secret GitHub fine-grained PAT jrollin-cartog-2eeb61a/crates/cartog-indexer/src/redact.rs :273
github…(47 chars, redacted)
- recent drift +20 capability drift →
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:jrollin/cartog/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of jrollin.