MCP server for Swiss official gazettes (SHAB + cantonal) — procurement and notices, no person data
This grade was produced by analyzer v30 , 3 version s behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.
- capability exposure inferred + 28
- trust mitigators mixed − 11
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
graded 7m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 25 → B · 17
- A · 0 → B · 25
No known CVEs for this server.
No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.
analyzed commit d44c425 · analyzer v30 · 2w ago
danger signals1
- suspicious endpoint 169.254.169.254 (cloud metadata) malkreide-amtsblatt-mcp-d44c425/tests/test_publication.py :241
await client.get("http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/")
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:malkreide/amtsblatt-mcp/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of malkreide.