github Python re-analysis due

malkreide/mcp-audit-skill

github

Claude-Skill für systematische MCP-Server-Audits gegen einen kuratierten Best-Practice-Standards-Korpus · 120 Checks · 12 Kategorien · OAuth 2.1, OWASP, Lethal Trifecta, Schweiz-Compliance (DSG/ISDS) · MIT

maintainer
malkreide
license
MIT
first seen
2026-07-29
last seen
2026-08-22
releases · 30d
14
short id
risk 32/100 · heuristic grade
B low inferred analyzer v32 (1 behind)

This grade was produced by analyzer v32 , 1 version behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.

  • capability exposure inferred + 35
  • trust mitigators mixed − 3

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 5m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety all quiet

No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.

skills & danger signals github-tarball
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:malkreide/mcp-audit-skill/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:malkreide/mcp-audit-skill/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of malkreide.