MCP server for Swiss commercial register (Zefix/Handelsregister) — company verification, UID lookup & due diligence for Swiss public administration
This grade was produced by analyzer v32 , 1 version behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.
- capability exposure inferred + 28
- trust mitigators mixed − 17
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
graded 6m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 17 → A · 11
- B · 25 → B · 17
- B · 21 → B · 25
- A · 3 → B · 21
No known CVEs for this server.
No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.
analyzed commit 766e95c · analyzer v32 · 1w ago
skills & prompt files 1
- agent-rules malkreide-register-mcp-766e95c/CLAUDE.md
danger signals1
- suspicious endpoint 169.254.169.254 (cloud metadata) malkreide-register-mcp-766e95c/tests/test_egress.py :32
await client.get("http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/")
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:malkreide/register-mcp/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of malkreide.