MCP Observatory
1m ago Tracked 26,753 Last 1m ago 24h 1,618
github Python analyzed 25ad041

n24q02m/better-code-review-graph

github

Knowledge graph for token-efficient code reviews -- semantic search and call-graph resolution across your codebase.

maintainer
n24q02m
license
Apache-2.0
first seen
2026-06-01
last seen
2026-08-02
releases · 30d
9
short id
risk 49/100 · heuristic grade
C elevated
  • capability exposure inferred + 35
  • recent drift inferred + 12
  • tool safety inferred + 5
  • trust mitigators mixed − 3

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 3m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 2 movements
  • C · 36 → C · 49
  • C · 44 → C · 36
capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +5
  1. medium dangerous code

    dynamic exec: __import__()

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 25ad041 · analyzer v28 · 2d ago

skills & prompt files 11

danger signals1

other grade factors evidence elsewhere
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:n24q02m/better-code-review-graph/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:n24q02m/better-code-review-graph/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of n24q02m.