MCP Observatory
github analyzed 5108c36

n24q02m/better-code-review-graph

github

Knowledge graph for token-efficient code reviews -- semantic search and call-graph resolution across your codebase.

maintainer
n24q02m
license
MIT
first seen
2026-06-01
last seen
2026-06-15
releases · 30d
21
short id
risk 44/100 · heuristic grade
C elevated
  • capability exposureinferred+35
  • tool safetyinferred+12
  • trust mitigatorsmixed−3

inferredmixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 7m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +12
  1. highexfiltration combosetup_status

    single tool reads + sends: net, secrets

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 5108c36 · analyzer v18 · 1h ago

skills & prompt files 8

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:n24q02m/better-code-review-graph/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:n24q02m/better-code-review-graph/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of n24q02m.