MCP server for Woodpecker CI: read repositories, pipelines and logs, and drive builds, secrets and crons
- capability exposure inferred + 6
- tool safety inferred + 5
- trust mitigators mixed − 11
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
grade last moved 6d ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- A · 3 → A · 0
- B · 23 → A · 3
No known CVEs for this server.
- medium toxic flow (lethal trifecta)
lethal trifecta reachable across this server's tool + source surface: private-data access + untrusted-content ingestion + network exfil (a leg is proven only in the analyzed source)
analyzed commit 1fecca5 · analyzer v33 · 2w ago
danger signals4
- suspicious endpoint 169.254.169.254 (cloud metadata) ni-c-woodpecker-ci-mcp-1fecca5/test/hosts.test.ts :27
['http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/', 'link-local'], - suspicious endpoint 1.1.1.1 ni-c-woodpecker-ci-mcp-1fecca5/test/hosts.test.ts :59
'https://1.1.1.1/x', - suspicious endpoint 100.100.100.200 (cloud metadata) ni-c-woodpecker-ci-mcp-1fecca5/test/hosts.test.ts :84
['http://100.100.100.200/latest/meta-data/', 'link-local'], - suspicious endpoint 192.0.0.192 ni-c-woodpecker-ci-mcp-1fecca5/test/hosts.test.ts :85
['http://192.0.0.192/latest/', 'link-local'],
Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of ni-c.