Self-hosted video API in one Docker container. Lipsync (LatentSync 1.5, Wav2Lip), face restoration (GFPGAN), ffmpeg ops (trim/concat/transcode/scale/mux/extract/thumbnail/gif), ffprobe metadata, async jobs + webhooks. REST + MCP. CPU + CUDA. Drive from shell, generated Go/Python clients, or LLM agent.
- capability exposure inferred + 35
- trust mitigators mixed − 11
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
grade last moved 1d ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 32 → B · 24
No known CVEs for this server.
No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.
analyzed commit e5788a6 · analyzer v33 · 2w ago
skills & prompt files 1
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:psyb0t/docker-flickies/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of psyb0t.