MCP Observatory
26m ago Tracked 19,435 Last 26m ago 24h 1,129
github re-analysis due

superdocsapp/superdocs-plugin

github

Edit, draft, summarize, export styled .docx/PDF/HTML/MD/RTF via 21 MCP tools + 4 prompts.

maintainer
superdocsapp
license
—
first seen
2026-06-03
last seen
2026-06-03
releases · 30d
0
short id
risk 4/100 · heuristic grade
A minimal
  • recent driftinferred+12
  • trust mitigatorsmixed−8

inferredmixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 14m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 1 movements
  • B · 16 → A · 4
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety all quiet

No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 616625a · analyzer v18 · 1d ago

skills & prompt files 1

other grade factors evidence elsewhere
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:superdocsapp/superdocs-plugin/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:superdocsapp/superdocs-plugin/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of superdocsapp.