github Python analyzed 90b47f4

technomaton/edpa

github

EDPA — Evidence-Driven Proportional Allocation. Derive hours from Git evidence. No timesheets.

maintainer
technomaton
license
MIT
first seen
2026-07-02
last seen
2026-07-21
releases · 30d
10
short id
risk 26/100 · heuristic grade
B low
  • capability exposure inferred + 4
  • recent drift inferred + 20
  • tool safety inferred + 5
  • trust mitigators mixed − 3

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

graded 8m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 1 movements
  • B · 30 B · 26
capability exposure grade factor +4
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +5
  1. medium dangerous code

    dynamic exec: __import__(), __import__ sink

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 90b47f4 · analyzer v28 · 3h ago

skills & prompt files 6

danger signals5

other grade factors evidence elsewhere
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:technomaton/edpa/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:technomaton/edpa/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of technomaton.