github Python re-analysis due

zb-ss/servonaut

github

Manage AWS, Hetzner, OVH, and custom servers from one TUI — with a built-in AI assistant and MCP server

maintainer
zb-ss
licence
MIT
first seen
2026-06-04
last seen
2026-09-17
releases · 30d
8
short id
risk 39/100 · heuristic grade
C elevated inferred analyzer v33 (current)
  • capability exposure inferred + 35
  • tool safety inferred + 12
  • trust mitigators mixed − 8

inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

grade last moved 1w ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

risk trajectory 6 movements
  • C · 44 C · 39
  • C · 36 C · 44
  • C · 56 C · 36
  • C · 49 C · 56
  • C · 41 C · 49
  • A · 0 C · 41
capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +12
  1. high dangerous code

    committed secret: OpenAI key, Stripe live key · dynamic exec: __import__()

skills & danger signals github-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed commit 9aae544 · analyzer v33 · 3d ago

danger signals4

embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:zb-ss/servonaut/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:zb-ss/servonaut/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of zb-ss.