Substrate-based context compaction for Claude Code. Inspectable signal weights, local-only, MCP-ready. Alternative to /compact + hook-based capture (claude-mem, etc.).
This grade was produced by analyzer v30 , 3 version s behind the one running now. Detectors added since have not been applied here, so it is not directly comparable with a server analyzed at the current version. A re-scan is queued.
- capability exposure inferred + 28
- tool safety inferred + 5
- trust mitigators mixed − 3
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
graded 6m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- C · 42 → B · 30
- B · 25 → C · 42
- C · 37 → B · 25
- C · 42 → C · 37
- C · 49 → C · 42
- A · 0 → C · 49
No known CVEs for this server.
- medium dangerous code
dynamic exec: eval()/exec()
analyzed commit 96328ee · analyzer v30 · 4d ago
skills & prompt files 1
- agent-rules zzallirog-weighted-compact-96328ee/CLAUDE.md
danger signals1
- dynamic code execution eval()/exec() zzallirog-weighted-compact-96328ee/weighted_compact/tool.py :1094
<div class="r-k" data-i18n="cheat.recon.eval.label">Run eval (bottom)</div>
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/github:zzallirog/weighted-compact/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of zzallirog.