npm JavaScript analyzed 0.8.0

@hasna/conversations

v0.8.0
npm

Real-time CLI messaging for AI agents

maintainer
andreihasna2
licence
Apache-2.0
first seen
2026-08-20
last seen
2026-09-17
releases · 30d
14
short id
risk 38/100 · heuristic grade
C elevated inferred analyzer v33 (current)
  • capability exposure inferred + 35
  • tool safety inferred + 5
  • supply-chain attested + 6
  • trust mitigators mixed − 8

attested inferred mixed

The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.

grade last moved 1w ago · see ecosystem CVEs →

capability exposure grade factor +35
Inferred surface — each links to servers holding it:
vulnerabilities 0 CVEs

No known CVEs for this server.

tool safety 1 findings · grade factor +5
  1. medium dangerous code

    dynamic exec: new Function()

skills & danger signals npm-tarball
prompt-surface shipped agent-instruction files + hidden-content / dangerous-code findings — quoted from the analyzed source

analyzed v0.8.0 · analyzer v33 · 1w ago

danger signals1

  • dynamic code execution new Function() package/bin/mcp.js :2894 const makeValidate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.default.scope}`, sourceCode);
other grade factors evidence elsewhere
embed badge readme-ready
live risk-grade badge preview [![MCP Observatory risk grade](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/npm:@hasna/conversations/badge.svg)](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/npm:@hasna/conversations/security)

Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of andreihasna2.