AI DevOps Framework - AI-assisted development workflows, code quality, and deployment automation
- capability exposure inferred + 4
- supply-chain attested + 6
- trust mitigators mixed − 14
These factors total -4, not 0: the score is bounded to 0–100 after they are summed, so this one is floored at 0. The factors are left as they were applied rather than rewritten to make the column add up.
attested inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
grade last moved 1w ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- A · 14 → A · 0
- B · 19 → A · 14
- A · 13 → B · 19
- A · 1 → A · 13
- A · 3 → A · 1
No known CVEs for this server.
No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.
analyzed v3.34.1 · analyzer v33 · 1d ago
skills & prompt files 2
- agent-rules package/templates/home/AGENTS.md
- agent-rules package/templates/home/git/AGENTS.md
danger signals1
- suspicious endpoint posthog.com (telemetry) package/packages/gui-web/src/RecommendedAppsSurface.tsx :81
duct analytics platform.", websiteUrl: "https://posthog.com/", alternativeToUrl: "https://alternativeto.net/software/posthog/", os: ["linux"], platforms: ["webapp", "saas", "cli", "api"] },
- supply-chain +6 supply-chain hub →
Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of marcusquinn.