Give your coding agent access to your Figma data. Implement designs in any framework in one-shot.
- capability exposure inferred + 6
- trust mitigators mixed − 19
These factors total -13, not 0: the score is bounded to 0–100 after they are summed, so this one is floored at 0. The factors are left as they were applied rather than rewritten to make the column add up.
inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
grade last moved 1d ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- A · 2 → A · 0
- A · 8 → A · 2
- B · 24 → A · 8
- A · 8 → B · 24
- B · 24 → A · 8
- B · 20 → B · 24
No known CVEs for this server.
No tool-safety findings — heuristic detectors run on the compute-risk cadence; a finding appears when a tool trips a rule.
analyzed v0.13.2 · analyzer v33 · 4w ago
danger signals1
- suspicious endpoint us.i.posthog.com (telemetry)
expected for this server's purpose
package/dist/chunk-BMERTI2I.js :1
LsUHU4TGGpgAiscm8nhjudHgAJzAdzXkJV",lt="https://us.i.posthog.com",M,te,oe,N=!0,re=!1,Ie=[],Fe=new nt;function ne(e,t){let o=e.filter(Boolean);return o.length===0?t():Fe.run(o,t)}function mt(e){return
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/npm:figma-developer-mcp/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of glips.