Trustworthy memory and security for AI agents. Memory firewall for any host that writes through it; runtime tool gates on Claude Code, OpenClaw, and Hermes.
- capability exposure inferred + 35
- tool safety inferred + 5
- supply-chain attested + 6
- trust mitigators mixed − 8
attested inferred mixed
The A–E grade is our heuristic synthesis — a "review this" prompt, not a verdict. Each factor is tagged by what backs it: attested (a verifiable record), reported (a third party's claim), or inferred (our own heuristic, e.g. permissions). See methodology.
graded 9m ago · see ecosystem CVEs →
- B · 33 → C · 38
- C · 48 → B · 33
- C · 53 → C · 48
- D · 65 → C · 53
No known CVEs for this server.
- medium toxic flow (lethal trifecta)
lethal trifecta reachable across this server's tool + source surface: private-data access + untrusted-content ingestion + network exfil (a leg is proven only in the analyzed source)
- low dangerous code
env-secret-flows-to-network-js: A process environment value reaches a network call. Review whether it is a credential leaving the process; the ordinary API-wrapper shape (read a ke
- supply-chain +6 supply-chain hub →
[](https://mcpobservatory.com/servers/npm:shieldcortex/security) Heuristic, inferred signals — false positives (legitimately powerful tools, forks, language ports) are expected. Treat each as "review this", not a verdict. See the ecosystem-wide picture on the security hub, or the fleet security of cyborgninja.